Implementation of Access and Benefit Sharing in Indonesia: Review and Case Studies

  • Ani Mardiastuti Department of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Agricultural University, Academic Ring Road, Campus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Indonesia 16680
Keywords: ABS, biopiracy, Convention on Biological Diversity, genetic resources, Sakata seed

Abstract

The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) was adopted in 2010, but Parties have been facing many challenges to implement the Protocol.   The objective of this paper is to provide information on the current status of the ABS implementation in Indonesia, and to present some case studies for drawing the lessons learned.  Information was collected through desk study and a Focal Group Discussion involving 25 resource persons from various stakeholders.  There were many institutions related to ABS, but unfortunately some key functions for ABS were still not assigned to a specific institution(s).  For law and regulations, there was no law and regulations specifically created for ABS (except Law no. 11/2013 on the Ratification of the Nagoya Protocol), but many existing laws and regulations can be used to address various issues related to ABS.  From three case studies presented, it was clear that there were many constraints and challenges to implement the Protocol.  The institutional arrangement as well as law and regulations are very crucial to ensure a fair and equitable sharing of the benefits derived from the use of genetic resources, under Nagoya Protocol.

References

Fajarwati M. 2016. Perlukah Dibentuk Peraturan Perundang-undangan Mengenai Sumber Daya Genetik?. RechtsVinding Online.

Greiber T, Morena SP, Ahren M, Carrasco JN, Kamau EC, Medaglia JC, Oliva MJ, Perron-Welch F. 2012. An Explanatory Guide to the Nagoya Protocol in Access and Benefit –sharing. Germany: IUCN Environmental Law Center.

Hartati D. 2012. Kajian Hukum mengenai Akses dan Pembagian Keuntungan pada Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Genetik Kelautan dan Perikanan [thesis]. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Irwin R. 2010. Indonesia, H5N1, and global health diplomacy. Global Health Governance III (2). Retrieved from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28272/ [5 Sept 2017].

Kusumadara A. 2011. Pemeliharaan dan Pelestarian Pengetahuan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Indonesia: Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan non-Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal Hukum, 18 (1), 20-41.

https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss1.art2

Lawson C, Hocking BA. 2010. Incentives for Global Public Health: Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines. UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjGmu729NXWAhXFp48KHWFfD3cQFggsMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvia.library.depaul.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1055%26context%3Djhcl&usg=AOvVaw3ovtKy_ANwe1vhwiAEyIhr.

Medaglia CJ, Perron-Welch F, Rukundo O. 2012. Overview of National and Regional Measure on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing the Nagoya Protocol. Montreal: Center for International Sustainable Development Law. http://cisdl.org/biodiversity-biosafety/public/CISDL_Overview_of_ABS_Measures_2nd_Ed.pdf.

Mu'jizah. 2016. Naskah Usada sebagai Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Bali. DIALEKTIKA: jurnal bahasa, sastra, dan pendidikan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 191-200. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/dialektika.

PAN Indonesia. 2013. Kampanye tentang penjarahan hayati oleh Shiseido (1999-2002): Kilas balik. Retrieved from http://biotaniindonesia.blogspot.co.id/2013/11/campaign-against-biopiracy-by-shiseido.html [5 Sept 2017].

Pangestu BD. 2016. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Genetik dan Pengetahuan Tradisional [thesis]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta.

Poucard N. 2017. Access and Benefit Sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Protocol: What Can Some Numbers Tell Us about the Effectiveness of the Regulatory Regime?. Resource, 6(11). doi:10.3390/resources6010011 www.mdpi.com/journal/resourcess.

https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6010011

Purwaningsih EH. 2013. Jamu, Obat Tradisional Asli Indonesia Pasang Surut Pemanfaatannya di Indonesia. eJKI, 1(2).

Rohaini. 2016. Establishing the Mechanism of Access and Sharing of Benefits Arising from the Utilization on Genetic Resources Related to Traditional Knowledge in Indonesia [dissertation]. Kanazawa: Kanazawa University.

Sakata Seed. 2016. Breakthrough agreement signed between Republic of Indonesia (IAARD) and Sakata Seed. Retrieved from: www.sakataornamentals.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/articles.detail/.../40/index.htm. [5 Sept 2017].

Sedyaningsih ER, Isfandari S, Soendoro T, Supari SF. 2008. Towards mutual trust, transparency and equity in virus sharing mechanism: The avian influenza case of Indonesia. Annals Academy of Medicine, 37(6), 482-488.

Siswandi AGC. 2013. Marine Bioprospecting: International Law, Indonesia and Sustainable Development [dissertation]. Australia: Australian National University. https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9730/2/01Front_Siswandi.pdf.

Tanjung NGA. 2017. Konsep Pencegahan Biopiracy di Indonesia berdasarkan Convention on Biological Diversity [under graduate thesis]. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Utami N. 2014. Suku Balsaminaceae di Jawa: Status Taksonomi dan Konservasinya. Berita Biologi, 13(1).

Yulia. 2015. Akses terhadap Biodiversiti dalam Pengaturan Internasional dan Indonesia. Unimal Pr. Lhokseumawe: Aceh.

Yulia, Zainol ZA. 2013. Melindungi Keanekaragaman Hayati dalam Rangka Protokol Nagoya. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(2), 271-283.

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16084.

Published
2019-05-10
How to Cite
Mardiastuti, A. (2019). Implementation of Access and Benefit Sharing in Indonesia: Review and Case Studies. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 25(1), 35. Retrieved from https://jagb.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmht/article/view/25134
Section
Articles