The role of the community and their collaboration with other actors are the attempts that are assured to ensure the sustainability of forest management. This study analyzes the role to determine the powers and interests as well as to classify groups by analyzing the interests and influences and analyzes actor-network by using Social Network Analysis (SNA) with KUMU application. PHBM is a form of collaboration between Perum Perhutani as the program designer and forest communities. Perhutani plays as the Key Players in the program with the role of initiating the PHBM program who has great control over forest management such as monitoring and licensing access to forests, as well as Coffee Farmers as the main subject of the program. SNA analysis shows that the key actor of PHBM is LMDH as an actor who has the most connections with other actors, the information center, information broker, and also the closest with other actors since it has the shortest communication path. LMDH’s roles and interactions support the success o community-based forest management.
Akamani, K., & Hall, Troy Elizabeth. (2019). Scale and Co-Management Outcomes: Assessing The Impact of Collaborative Forest Management on Community and Household Resilience. Heliyon 5, 1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01125
Angst. M., et.al (2018). Connectors and coordinators in natural resource governance: insights from Swiss water supply. Ecology and Society. 23 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10030-230201
Bahruzin. (2014). Analisis Efektivitas Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (PHBM) di Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan (KPH) Bandung Utara Jawa Barat. Tesis. Bogor, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Bartlett, A G. (2018). Factors affecting the success of collaborative forestry research in Papua New Guinea, Australian Forestry, 81(2), 116-128, DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2018.1462546
Bartra, V.A. (2007). An Institutional Framework for A More Efficient Use of Natural Resources. Minerals and Energy. Vol 22. 48-61.
Bloomfield, G., et.al. (2019). Strategic Insights for Capacity Development on Forest Landscape Restoration: Implications for Addressing Global Commitments. Tropical Conservation Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919887589
Bonzaaier, C.C. (2012). Towards a Community-based Integrated Institutional Framework for Ecotourism Management: The Case of The Masebe Nature Reserve, Limpopo Province of South Africa. Journal of Anthropology. Vol. 2012.
Carter, J., J. Gronow. (2005). Recent Experience in Collaborative Forest Management: A Review Paper. Center for International Forestry Research.
Chen, H., et al. (2012). Community forestry management and livelihood development in northwest China: integration of governance, project design, and community participation. Regional Environment Change. 67-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-012-0316-3
Desmiwati & Christian, F Y. (2008). Levelling Up The Collaborative Forest Management in Indonesia: A Review. Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IUFRO, Bogor.
Gunawan, B. dkk. (2004). Community Dependency on Forest Resources in West Java, Indonesia: The Need to Re-Involve Local People in Forest Management. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 18 (4). 29-46. DOI: 10.1300/J091v18n04_02
Hanneman RA, Riddle M. 2011. A brief introduction to analyzing social network data. In the Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis; Scott J., Carrington, PJ, Eds. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 40-54.
Kimengsi, J.N., et.al. (2019). What (De)Motivates Forest Users’ Participation in Co- Management? Evidence from Nepal. Forests, 10, 512; doi:10.3390/f10060512.
Martins, H., J. G. Borges. (2007). Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management. 107-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.039
Mohammed, A.J., et.al. (2017). Moving forward in collaborative forest management: Role of external actors for sustainable Forest socio-ecological systems. Forest Policy and Economics. 74. 13-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.010
Murphy, R.J.A., P.Jones. (2020). Leverage Analysis: A Method for Locating Points of Influence In Systemy Design Decisions. FormAkadeemisk. 12 (2). Pp. 1-25.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.
Poudyal, B.H., et.al. (2019). Scientific Forest Management Practice in Nepal: Critical Reflections from Stakeholders' Perspectives. Forests. 11 (27). 1-20.
Pribadi, R., et.al. (2020). Enhancing the Role of the District Government in Decentralized Forest Management. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika. 26 (2). 114-122. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.26.2.114
Pujo., et.al. (2018). Community Capacity Building in Social Forestry Development: A Review. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29(2), 113-126. Doi: 10.5614/jrcp.2018.29.2.3
Reed, S.M., et.al (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(16), 1933–1949
Ribot.J.C, dan N. L. Peluso. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology. 68 (2). pp. 153-181
Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel., et.al (2015). Meanings, drivers, and motivations for community-based conservation in Latin America. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY. 20 (33). DOI:10.5751/ES-07733-200333.
Santika, T., et.al. (2017). Community Forest Management in Indonesia: Avoided Deforestation in The Contect of Anthropogenic and Climate Complexities. Global Environmental Change. 47. 60-71.
Sunderlin, W.D., et.al. (2008). Poverty and Forests: Multi-country Analysis of Spatial Association and Proposed Policy Solutions. Center Fore International Forestry Research.
Syahputra, O.K.H., et.al. (2018). Jejaring kekuasaan aktor dalam pengelolaan hutan mangrove berbasis masyarakat di Provinsi Aceh. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 9 (2), 380-393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.2.380-393
Talley, J.L., et.al. (2016). A Simplified Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in Natural Resource Management: The Five-Feature Network. Ecology and Society. 21(4):38.
Thondhlana, G., et.al. (2015). Local institutions, actors, and natural resource governance in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and surrounds, South Africa. Land Use Policy. 47.121-129. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.013
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).